Rumors about introductions sooner than expected for both iPhone as if to iPad are getting stronger and it seems that few have doubts that Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), is willing to shorten your production cycles. However, some analysts go a little further and predict that those in Cupertino could move directly to a new policy of releases biannual. We show you what the calendar of launches of Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), according to these analysts for this 2013.
The presentation of iPad 4 in October it was caught by surprise in all the media because, until that moment, the annual releases of mobile devices Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), they were an established fact. Little by little rumors began to arrive that neither for him iPhone 5S or for iPad 5 it was going to be a year of waiting and that we would have them on the market for the summer of this year. However, the latest leaks already tell us that the launch of both could take place as close as March. Although, obviously, there are still those who simply remain skeptical about the rumors that arise from the environment of the suppliers of Cupertino in China, most of the experts seem to give them credibility and some begin to interpret the situation as a change of strategy what would I do with the releases of the new models iPhone y iPad an event that would take place every 6 months. Although there are no official confirmations, with this new theory in the background, in Mac Stories have launched to build the calendar of pitches it could have Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), prepared for this year. As you can see, and in line with the latest leaks, we could have the iPhone 5S en March, iPad 5 and iPad mini 2 en April, iPhone 6 en September and iPad 6 and iPad mini 3 en October.
What would be the advantages of this new strategy? In the first place, and as has already been commented on other times, biannual launches would give those in Cupertino the ability to keep their devices up to date, which is increasingly difficult with the growth and power of manufacturers Android they put innovations on the market more and more frequently. But secondly, in MacStories they point to an advantage that until now has not been pointed out much in the media: Apple could get rid of the sales cycles that put them in so many difficulties to satisfy all the demand they generate. What at first might seem a drawback, the fact that users were increasingly incentivized to "skip" a generation of iPhone o iPad, could contribute to distribute demand more evenly throughout the year and avoid the collapses that these large sales peaks represent for their suppliers (and more and more since they have dispensed with Samsung and they have been "forced" to work with a greater number of smaller manufacturers, as we are seeing, for example, with supply problems that are found for iPad mini). As always, we will have to wait to see what really happens, but this resulting approach is quite plausible.